This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Friday, September 29, 2006

UAL Head to Stay Until 2011 While Merger Rumors Swirl

United Airlines today extended the contract of its CEO, Glenn Tilton, until 2011, ending speculation about his departure (his previous contract expired next year).

Tilton joined United in September of 2002 and headed the airline during its long Chapter 11 bankruptcy process. But now that United's out of bankruptcy, Tilton is calling for 'more consolidation' in the industry - meaning mergers of some sort. "Deregulation has done its work," he told the Financial Times earlier this year. "It's time to recognise that we should compete on a grander scale. Should the opportunity present itself, we'll make sure we're in a position to take advantage."

Which airline would Tilton like to see United merge with? Most people think Continental, because the two airlines operate similar aircraft and don't generally fly the same types of routes. Continental has a strong Latin America and European presence and United's Asian route network is the best in the industry. Yet Continental's CEO, Larry Kellner, has repeatedly said that Continental wishes to remain independent.

Whether or not that happens we'll have to see, but I bet that two of the legacies will merge next year... probably a United/Continental combination

Friday, September 22, 2006

United: Help Us Get Into China

Not to be outdone by American, United yesterday emailed its Mileage Plus members a similar plea to sign a petition to help the airline fly from Washington to Beijing (see last post). United, with the support of the governors of Virginia and Maryland and the mayor of Washington DC (as well as other economic organisations) set up a website to explain their petition.

United is petitioning the Department of Transportation to be allowed to be the first domestic carrier to have a direct route between Washington, D.C. Dulles (IAD) and Beijing, China (PEK). Right now, 28 other world capitals have this route to Beijing; Washington, D.C. deserves to be next!

We are asking our members to please add their name and support to this initiative. It will only take a few moments of your time.

Simply click here to read our petition. Then add your name and address below to the form.

Thank you in advance for your participation.


Here's the text of the petition:

The Honorable Maria Cino
Acting Secretary
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: Docket 2006-25275

Dear Madam Secretary:
I am writing to express my solid support for the application by United to initiate the first nonstop capital-to-capital service between Washington, D.C. Dulles (IAD) and Beijing, China (PEK), effective March 25, 2007.

If approved, United's application would create the first capital-to-capital service between the United States and China. This would not only be the most efficient route for the residents of the Washington, D.C. area, but provide an easy connection from cities throughout the eastern half of the United States.

The capital-to-capital route serves to enhance and strengthen the economic and political relationships between our two countries, and opens a welcome, and necessary, door to China. I respectfully ask that the Department grant United's application for the Washington Dulles to Beijing route. Thank you for your attention to their application.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

American: Help Us Get Into China

It seems like American Airlines is needing a bit of help to fly into China, or so it seems from an email that they sent out to the AAdvantage members:

Two Days Left To Support Our New Gateway To China

American Airlines recently applied to the U.S. Department of Transportation for the authority to fly from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport to Beijing, China, beginning March 2007. Three other airlines have also submitted an application for an additional China flight, but only one U.S. airline will be awarded the right to add a daily flight to and from China.

As one of our valued AAdvantage® members, you can help us open a new gateway to China. The Department of Transportation bases its decision on many factors, and one of the most important is the amount of community support. By signing your name to an online petition you can show your support.

How will you benefit if American flies to China? DFW is American's largest hub where it operates almost 800 total daily flights with service to 129 domestic destinations. Establishing a flight to China from DFW will provide you with an expanded network of exciting destinations and more ways to both earn and redeem AAdvantage miles. In addition, once in China, you can connect to 24 destinations in the country's interior through our codeshare partner China Eastern Airlines.

Please sign this petition by Friday, September 22 and help us bring this valuable service to DFW. Visit www.FlytoChinaonAA.com. You'll also find more information about American Airlines and our proposed flight to Beijing.

Sincerely,

Dan Garton
Executive Vice President, Marketing

Tuesday, August 1, 2006

Russian Airline Alliance?

Russian news agency RIA Novosti is reporting that a 25% stake in number-two Russian airline S7 might be transferred to flag-carrier Aeroflot if the two airlines establish an alliance. If no alliance occurs, then the stake will be put up for auction.

The government, which owns the 25% stake, has been trying to sell it as part of its privitization plan. Of course Aeroflot is pleased with the idea of holding a large stake in its biggest rival, which focuses on services out of Moscow, Novosibirsk and Irkutsk. Aeroflot has one hub - Moscow. Their slogan might as well be 'All routes lead to Moscow' - a system that's pretty inefficient. For example, if you want to fly from Petropavlosk-Kamchatsky to Vladivostok, you have to fly to Moscow - a ten hour flight and then an eight and a half hour flight. However, S7 has a direct route between the two cities that cuts travel time considerably.

Of course, there are government critics of the transfer, who say that the transfer could make Aeroflot more capable of blocking S7's route expansion, especially on international routes, where Aeroflot dominates. But even if that's the case, Aeroflot is a long way from the Soviet days, when it was the only Russian airline.

The Smoker's Airline

Are you tired of the continual cutbacks and restrictions that almost every airline has implemented over the last few years? No meals in economy, or if you're on Northwest, no food at all... Less seatroom, no magazines, no pillows, no blankets... And for some people, the worst restriction is on that little habit that many take up that's called smoking. Smoking is understandably banned on all US flights and in most countries by now (Aeroflot bans smoking too, but do you actually believe them?). And smokers that do want to light up whilst in flight have to find an airline that will accomodate them - not an easy thing nowadays.

Well, traveling smokers will no longer be forced to go through Nicotine Withdrawl for several hours while in flight, because a brand new airline is being launched - especially for smokers. That's right, the Dusseldorf, Germany-based Smokers' International Airline (Smintair) will allow smoking in all 138 seats on board two leased Boeing 747-400s. Flights will start on March 26 between Dusseldorf and Tokyo's Narita airport.

Smintair's chief, Alexander Schoppmann (himself a smoker, of course), said that he had been planning the airline for over a year. "I have been a traveler for the best part of 50 years," he told CNN. "I have seen the level of service go down and the price go up."

Each passenger will also be able to watch TV on 15-inch screens and be able to access the internet inflight.

"SMINTAIR will bring back the joy of flying by offering only 30 first class and 108 business class seats on a "Jumbo Jet", one of the most reliable planes in the World," boasts its website. Being cooped up in a smoke-filled "Jumbo Jet" for thirteen hours doesn't exactly sound like my idea of the Joy of Flying, but perhaps it does to some people. Then again, I belong in the non-smokers category, a category that Smintair seems keen on attracting.

"Non-smokers will find the cabin air more refreshing than on any other flight with any other airline, as SMINTAIR adds fresh outside air to the conditioning system!" its website proudly proclaims. But it's no secret that the air on board an aircraft is just circulated around, no matter how much 'outside air' is added.

But, if this sounds like a good airline to you, you're not only welcome to fly it, but invest in it as well. All you need to secure a 1% stake in Smintair is one million euros. And the airline's website certainly tries to assure you that your investment will be a smart one: "It is of extreme logic, that an investment in SMINTAIR will be extremely profitable, as it is connected to a lower than average risk. A very conservative business plan, even calculating Kerosene prices on the basis of US$100/barrel crude oil, foresees a profit margin of more than €50Mio/p.a. (per airplane), taking fully booked aircraft into consideration. With only 138 available seats in each of our BOEING 747-400ER and tens of millions of smokers in Europe and Asia, this is certainly not an impossible task."

Or is it? I know one thing's for sure - I, like most non-smokers, would probably prefer to book on Lufthansa instead. After all, there's no smoking there, and I'm sure that their CEO (the guy with the beard in the picture) is less amatueurish than Smintair's - I'll leave you today with the first two paragraphs of his letter to potential fliers (see the rest here):


Ladies and Gentlemen, dear Guests,

before I would like to share my next to 50 years of experience as an airline passenger with you, I'd like to take the opportunity to clear one of the biggest lies floating around everywhere in the World:
"Second Hand Smoke (SHS, a.k.a. ETS, Environmental Tobacco Smoke) damages your health".
The WHO (World Health Orgaisation) confirms in all of it's studies concerning the subject, that ETS has not even a statistcally relevant effect on the non-smoker's health! If you want to go deeper into the subject, without prejudice, please refer to following link: http://www.thetruthisalie.com. You will be more than surprised of the amount of facts and neutral proof. By the way, did you know that the NAZIs also sported a huge Anti-Smoking campaign? Yes, they did and the one we experience now, frightningly, carries exactly the same insignia.

Now on to a more pleasant subject than the NAZIs and a fat lie:
In the 50s, 60s and 70s, I was always looking foreward to every flight, enjoying a luxurious experience above the clouds. The stewardesses (yes, that was the job title and they were proud of it!) were all friendly, very pretty and, in their fresh uniforms, elegant. In general, the service was first class, even back in the "economy" section. The spacing between the comfortable seats was sufficient, in the then smaller aircraft, even for tall people like me. For a long time, you were greeted with a vast selection of "Monte Christ" cigars, in LUFTHANSA's First Class, even before the plane took off! However, times do change. "Thanks CHRIST", one should exclaim, as everything becomes even more comfortable, .... except for the life of an airline passenger!

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Airports: They Wreck the Air Travel Experience

Yesterday I flew United Airlines from Boston to Spokane, Washington via Denver. The flight itself was quite enjoyable. The check-in process was not.

Of course, United's check-in facilities in Boston were crowded, even at 6:45 in the morning. I spent close to half an hour waiting in line, and saw one check-in person even go on break and return fifteen minutes later, when there were still lots of people waiting to be processed. By the time my bags were checked and my boarding pass was handed to me, it was 7:15 - running quite a bit late for a 7:55 flight!

Then came that awful reality of air travel nowadays - the dreaded security line. I would have missed my flight had the security woman allowed us to cut in front of everyone else upon seeing my boarding pass.

Then, after being whisked through security, I showed up at the gate only to realize that the plane that that I was supposed to take to Denver had not yet arrived. Instead, a Ted (United's low-fare subsidiary) aircraft would be flying our route. And that meant that they had to deplane and clean the plane too (even though you can't notice the difference if they clean the plane or not). All that time spent worrying and looking at the clock had gone to waste!

Of course, the flights themselves were nice. United has a fabulous terminal at Denver, and the process of switching flights was not stressful at all. But I find that the check in process is always the most stressful of the air travel experience, along with security.

Friday, July 28, 2006

Best Airline TV Ad?

Here's a post that I hope some of the readers of this blog will get involved in: what, in your opinion, is the best airline TV ad ever? Even notable or just interesting ones would be nice to list. If possible, I'll try to find it online and post it here. (Please add your response in the form of a comment.)

Here are some interesting ones. Note that the first two don't feature aircraft too prominately:

Aeroflot:


Air France (1999):


Braniff Airways (1975:)


United Airlines (1994):